MODERN POULTRY VACCINATION TECHNOLOGIES: STRATEGIES FOR INCREASING IMMUNITY

Authors

  • Елена Анатольевна Присакарь Кузбасский государственный аграрный университет им. В.Н. Полецкова, г. Кемерово, Россия Автор
  • Ярослава Андреевна Борисова Кузбасский государственный аграрный университет им. В.Н. Полецкова, г. Кемерово, Россия Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71453/3034-4174-2025-3-74

Keywords:

poultry vaccination, immunity, vector vaccines, in ovo method, avian influenza, serological monitoring, biosecurity

Abstract

The article examines modern strategies of vaccination prophylaxis in industrial poultry farming. Various types of vaccines are analyzed – from traditional live attenuated and inactivated to innovative vector platforms. Methods of vaccine administration are presented, including aerosol immunization and in ovo technology. The role of maternal antibodies in post-vaccination immunity formation and the importance of serological monitoring for evaluating vaccination program effectiveness are considered. Modern approaches to immunization against highly pathogenic avian influenza using marker vaccines and DIVA strategy are analyzed. It is shown that successful vaccination prophylaxis is only possible with a comprehensive approach that takes into account biosecurity of production, proper selection of vaccines and optimal schemes of their application. Biosecurity remains a fundamental condition for the effectiveness of any immunization programs.

Author Biographies

  • Елена Анатольевна Присакарь, Кузбасский государственный аграрный университет им. В.Н. Полецкова, г. Кемерово, Россия

    кандидат сельскохозяйственных наук, доцент кафедры зоотехнии

  • Ярослава Андреевна Борисова, Кузбасский государственный аграрный университет им. В.Н. Полецкова, г. Кемерово, Россия

    студент

References

1. Герке, А. Н. Бактериальный фолликулит у собак // VetPharma. 2015. № 4 (26). С. 38–46.

2. Заякина, Д. И., Смолянинова, Ю. А. Дифференциальная диагностика и лечение поверхностно бактериального фолликулита собак // Научные исследования студентов в решении актуальных проблем АПК : мат-лы Всерос. студенч. науч.-практич. конф., Иркутск, 17–18 февраля 2022 года. В IV т. Т. III. п. Молодежный: Иркутский государственный аграрный университет им. А.А. Ежевского, 2022. С. 36-40. EDN WNVPFA.

3. Genotypic relatedness and phenotypic characterization of Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies in clinical samples from dogs / C.L. Cain [et al.] //American Journal of Veterinary Research. 2011. Т. 72, № 1. P. 96–102.

4. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans isolated from dogs with otitis externa and pyoderma in Peru / J.A.P. Farfán [et al.] // Open Veterinary Journal. 2021. Т. 11, № 3. P. 364–364.

5. Isolation of Staphylococcus schleiferi from dogs with pyoderma / L. A. Frank et al. // Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2003. Т. 222, № 4. P. 451–454.

6. Screening for skin carriage of methicillin‐resistant coagulase‐positive staphylococci and Staphylococcus schleiferi in dogs with healthy and inflamed skin / G. C. Griffeth [et al.] // Veterinary dermatology. 2008. Т. 19, № 3. P. 142–149.

7. Kim, Y. Zoonotic Potential of Staphylococcus schleiferi Through Adherence to Canine and Human Corneocytes // Journal of Veterinary Clinics. 2017. № 34. P. 225–227.

8. Genotypic relatedness and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus schleiferi in clinical samples from dogs in different geographic regions of the United States / D. A. Kunder [et al.] // Veterinary Dermatology. 2015. Т. 26, № 6. P. 406-e94.

9. Detection and characterization of potential virulence determinants in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and S. schleiferi strains isolated from canine otitis externa in Korea / G. Y. Lee [et al.] // Journal of Veterinary Science. 2023. Т. 24, № 6. P. e85.

10. Markey, B.K., Leonard, F.C. Resistant Staphylococci in Animals // Veterinary Sciences. 2023. Т. 10, № 4. P. 240.

11. May, E.R., Kinyon, J.M., Noxon, J.O. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus schleiferi from healthy dogs and dogs with otitis, pyoderma or both // Veterinary microbiology. 2012. Т. 160, № 3-4. P. 443–448.

12. Screening of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus intermedius, and Staphylococcus schleiferi isolates obtained from small companion animals for antimicrobial resistance: a retrospective review of 749 isolates (2003–04) / D. O. Morris [et al.] // Veterinary dermatology. 2006. Т. 17, № 5. P. 332–337.

13. Molecular characterization and clinical relevance of taxonomic reassignment of Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies into two separate species, Staphylococcus schleiferi and Staphylococcus coagulans / S.Y. Naing [et al.] // Microbiology spectrum. 2023. Т. 11, № 2. P. e04670-22.

14. Palomino, F. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans associated with otitis externa and pyoderma in dogs. // Open Veterinary Journal. 2021. № 11. P. 364–369.

15. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus schleiferi isolated from dogs / M. Vanni [et al.] // Research in veterinary science. 2009. Т. 87, № 2. P. 192–195.

16. White, S.D., Cole, L.K. Pyoderma, Otitis Externa and Otitis Media // Greene's Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat. WB Saunders, 2021. С. 1551–1568.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

Issue

Innovative Solutions in the Agroindustrial Complex

Section

ПРОДУКТИВНОЕ ЖИВОТНОВОДСТВО

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Инновационные решения в АПК

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Все материалы Журнала распространяются на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)